Adding to Ancient Egypt or Ancient Greece

Learning Goal: I’m working on a other question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

Assignment 2: Adding to Ancient Egypt or Ancient Greece

Here is your second attempt at selecting and explaining to “fill in the blanks” of what our modules on Ancient Africa (Egypt) or Ancient Greece didn’t discuss.

This time, you will find the work to discuss from Smarthistory’s essays. Here are the parameters:

  • the object must be discussed in an essay (not a video)
  • the object cannot be one discussed in the course module

Choose a work from one of the following pages. Scroll down to “All Content” and be sure to click “Show More” to see the full range of possibilities. There are many works to choose from:

Visit the linked page, download an image of the object, and read the accompanying essay. Look for the four categories of information: physical properties, form (including architectural elements for architecture), subject matter (or parts of the structure for architecture), and context. Use the Art History as Practice Module to help distinguish these categories.

Open the Word document template  Download template. Insert the image of the object, making sure that it is large enough to be clearly seen.

Add the identifying information about Title, Artist/Culture, Date, and Module to the Introduction.

Perform the four-part analysis of the work. Take care to put the information in the right category. Use relevant terms from the module list and point to specific evidence in the work of art you selected in your analysis.

Begin your justification of the work you selected by explaining what concept from the module the object illustrates, selecting from the list on the module page titled, “Module Concepts.” Do not just list a term. The concepts are full-sentence statements about the art in the module. For example, “Renaissance art promoted the principles of humanism.” In this section, explain in detail and with evidence how the work you selected illustrates the concept.

Next, complete your justification by comparing the work you selected to one of the works discussed in the module videos, pointing out how the new work is similar to the comparative work and shares terms and concepts with it.

Finally, provide a brief conclusion.

Do this work in Word only (not Pages) and save as a pdf.

Put everything in your own words. Do not copy or transcribe anything. All writing in this class must be original. Cite the source of your information using the citation format listed under “Cite this Page” on the Smarthistory essay page. Do not just list the website URL. Here is an example:

Dr. Anna Blume, “Bannerstones, North America,” in Smarthistory, June 3, 2021, accessed December 4, 2021, https://smarthistory.org/bannerstones-north-america/) (Links to an external site.).

Rubric

Survey Assignment 2_1221 (1)

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObject selectionAppropriateness of object selection: date, culture, geographic location, source, non-duplication
10 ptsFull Marks 0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeObject identificationObject fully identified in Introduction
5 ptsFull Marks 0 ptsNo Marks
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConcept selectionSelects appropriate Module Concept from Module Concepts page
10 ptsFull Marks 0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis: Physical PropertiesQuality of analysis of physical properties
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

Correct analysis, evidence from object provided, sufficient length to be complete.

22 to >17.0 ptsGood

Mostly correct analysis, evidence from object provided although some missing, could use some development.

17 to >15.0 ptsMarginal

Mostly incorrect/incomplete analysis, limited evidence, much development needed.

15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Missing or information provided does not meet parameters of assignment.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis: FormQuality of analysis of form
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

Correct analysis, evidence from object provided, sufficient length to be complete.

22 to >17.0 ptsGood

Mostly correct analysis, evidence from object provided although some missing, could use some development.

17 to >15.0 ptsMarginal

Mostly incorrect/incomplete analysis, limited evidence, much development needed.

15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Missing or information provided does not meet parameters of assignment.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis: ContentQuality of analysis of content
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

Correct analysis, evidence from object provided, sufficient length to be complete.

22 to >17.0 ptsGood

Mostly correct analysis, evidence from object provided although some missing, could use some development.

17 to >15.0 ptsMarginal

Mostly incorrect/incomplete analysis, limited evidence, much development needed.

15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Missing or information provided does not meet parameters of assignment.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis: ContextQuality of analysis of context
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

Correct analysis, evidence from object provided, sufficient length to be complete.

22 to >17.0 ptsGood

Mostly correct analysis, evidence from object provided although some missing, could use some development.

17 to >15.0 ptsMarginal

Mostly incorrect/incomplete analysis, limited evidence, much development needed.

15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Missing or information provided does not meet parameters of assignment.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustification: ConceptQuality of justification of how the object relates to the Module Concept
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

Correct justification, evidence provided, sufficient length to be complete.

22 to >17.0 ptsGood

Somewhat effective justification, evidence provided although some missing, could use some development.

17 to >15.0 ptsMarginal

Mostly incorrect/incomplete justification, limited evidence, much development needed.

15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Missing or information provided does not meet parameters of assignment.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustification: ComparisonQuality of comparison to work in the module to justify object selection
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

Correct justification via comparison, evidence from objects provided, sufficient length to be complete.

22 to >17.0 ptsGood

Somewhat effective comparison, evidence from objects provided although some missing, could use some development.

17 to >15.0 ptsMarginal

Mostly incorrect/incomplete justification, limited evidence, much development needed.

15 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Missing or information provided does not meet parameters of assignment.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitationSources consulted identified correctly
10 ptsFull Marks 0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritingApplication of rules of standard English regarding spelling, grammar, and punctuation
5 ptsFull Marks 0 ptsNo Marks
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of FeedbackExplanation of how feedback from prior assignment used in preparation of current assignment
10 ptsFull Marks 0 ptsNo Marks
10 pts
Total Points: 200

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

mahjong ways 2